In a controversial move, the conservative majority in Britain has passed a plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda as a way to address the issue of illegal immigration. Critics have called the plan inhumane, expensive, and potentially ineffective in dealing with the root causes of migration. The policy aims to deter migrants and asylum seekers from crossing the English Channel, where thousands have attempted the journey in small boats from France.
The legislation has faced opposition in the House of Lords over concerns about human rights violations and the legality of the plan. Proponents argue that the plan will save lives by disrupting human smuggling operations and creating a deterrent for illegal crossings.
The cost of the program is estimated to be around $670 million over five years, with each deportee costing the British taxpayer around $2.5 million. Critics point out that this cost is significantly higher than a three-year stay at a luxury hotel, raising questions about the practicality and effectiveness of the plan.
The delayed implementation of the policy has been attributed to legal challenges and political turmoil in the British government. Rwanda has been selected as the destination for deported asylum seekers, but concerns have been raised about the country’s human rights record and the treatment of migrants.
Despite the controversy, the British government is moving ahead with the plan, with the first deportation flights expected to take off within the next few months. The government is also exploring similar agreements with other countries as part of their immigration strategy.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com
