A recent court decision has revived former Alaska governor Sarah Palin’s libel lawsuit against The New York Times. The case stems from a 2017 editorial that falsely linked Palin to a mass shooting in Arizona. Palin filed the lawsuit in 2017, but the case was dismissed in 2020. However, a federal appeals court has now reversed that decision, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.
The editorial in question was published shortly after a mass shooting in Virginia, in which a congressman was injured. The editorial falsely stated that Palin’s political action committee had distributed a map that showed crosshairs over the districts of certain lawmakers, including the one who was injured in the shooting. This insinuation was quickly debunked, as the map in question targeted the lawmakers’ districts, not the lawmakers themselves.
Palin’s lawsuit alleges that The New York Times acted with actual malice in publishing the false information, as the editorial board knew or should have known that the statements were untrue. The court’s decision to revive the lawsuit is a significant victory for Palin, as it gives her the opportunity to seek justice and clear her name.
The New York Times has defended its editorial, arguing that it was an honest mistake made in the midst of a fast-moving news cycle. The newspaper has vowed to continue fighting the lawsuit, which could have far-reaching implications for the media industry as a whole.
Overall, the court’s decision to revive Palin’s lawsuit against The New York Times is a positive development for the former governor, as it brings her one step closer to vindication and holding the newspaper accountable for its false statements. The case is sure to draw continued attention as it makes its way through the legal system.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com