Conservative commentator Chris Rufo has criticized the New York Times for what he calls a biased and misleading coverage of the plagiarism scandal surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris. In an interview with Fox News, Rufo accused the Times of “lying by omission” and failing to provide a fair and balanced account of the story.
The controversy began when it was revealed that Harris had lifted a story about civil rights icon Martin Luther King Jr. from a 1965 Playboy interview and presented it as her own during an interview with Elle magazine. The Times initially downplayed the incident, describing it as a minor mistake made by Harris’ staff. However, Rufo argues that this was a deliberate attempt to downplay the seriousness of the plagiarism.
Rufo claims that the Times failed to report several key facts about the incident, including Harris’ history of plagiarism and the fact that she had previously been accused of plagiarizing a speech by Robert Kennedy. He also criticized the Times for not holding Harris accountable for her actions and for failing to provide proper context for the story.
Rufo’s comments come at a time when mainstream media outlets are facing increased scrutiny for their coverage of political figures. Critics argue that bias and selective reporting can have a significant impact on public perception and influence elections. Rufo’s criticism of the Times highlights the importance of fair and accurate reporting in today’s media landscape.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com